PPC : Review of the PPC Charging Scheme : Meetings : 29th March
2007
PPC User Group – 29 March 2007 - Riccarton
| |
Discussion |
Actions |
| 1 |
Present: C Bayes (Chair - SEPA), R Robertson
(S.Exec), S Freeland (SESA), C Wood (CPI), D Blue (SWA), D Forrest
(UKPIA), P Loggie (NFUS), I Norton , J Shaw (SEPA), A Terry (SEPA),
N Donnelly (SEPA), J Burns (SEPA)
|
|
| 2 |
Apologies: A Mitchell, R Burke, |
|
| 3 |
C Bayes: Welcome |
|
| 4 |
Previous Minutes |
|
| 5 |
Update on PPC progress: J Burns detailed
progress on Permit determination, 115 Applications received since
Nov 06. Corporate target to determine all Permit applications
within required timescale. (see presentation for details)
EUETS – Introduction to 2nd Stage query – Invite Mike
Cunningham to address next mtg. (After meeting Mike agreed to do a
presentation at the next meeting)
|
ND |
| 6 |
Presentation on Compliance Project: A Terry
progress on development of a compliance scheme which is generic,
proportionate, open and robust. Scheme to be numerically driven to
limit subjectivity.
Provide feedback and comment on compliance project
|
All |
| 7 |
Review of PPC charging scheme implementation
timetable: J Shaw outlined the proposal to have 2 phases
for the review. Phase 1 covering minor items will be concluded by
April 2008. Phase 2 covering structural changes will be implemented
by 2009 |
|
| 8 |
PPC Charging Scheme Workshop: J Burns provided
a review of the project principals followed by recap of previously
agreed workshop priorities.
The main part of the presentation then outlined alternative options
which were then discussed during a workshop. A number of
alternative options were discussed and an agreed short list was
then gone through in detail. An important factor was that the new
scheme should include some form of “compliance” which recognises
the level of compliance at a site versus the permit /
regulations.
The workshop then compared 4 options. Attachment
1 provides a summary of the workshop. The favoured option
(option 2) was based on the sector scheme (current scheme) with
improved documentation to improve transparency plus compliance.
Both options including location specifics were considered to be
slightly more complex without adding much benefit since many of the
aspects would be considered under compliance (e.g. if a site is
close to a vulnerable receptor (say SSSI) then there may well be
tighter requirements placed in the permit making compliance
harder)
All parties are requested to consider the options and come back if
any concerns arise. J Burns invited any member of the meeting who
wanted further discussions of the options to contact him at any
point.
|
All |
| 9 |
AOB: A Terry advised that conclusions of the
OPRA determinations for the previous 12 months will be released to
the press in April.
P Loggie reducing PPC entrance thresholds for would be contested by
industry as the cost increase would be seen as prohibitive. A
further cost related query was raised but was agreed to be taken
out with the meeting.
|
JS |
| 10 |
DONM – Thur 28th June 2007 –
Meeting Room booked in the Stirling (Bremner) 10:00 for 10:30. |
|