How does Part IIA work?

Local authorities are required to inspect their areas to identifiy land as contaminated, in line with their strategy for inspection. Where land is identified as contaminated, local authorities will need to secure remediation of it either by: agreeing remediation with the Appropriate Person/s, who will issue a remediation statement; serving a remediation notice on the Appropriate Person/s; or undertaking the work itself and issuing a remediation statement, recovering costs from Appropriate Persons where possible. In some circumstances it may be unreasonable for the land to be remediated, in which case the land will remain contaminated and a remediation declaration will be issued by the local authority. Public registers will record the notification of identification of contaminated land and remedial activity at such land.

Some contaminated land will be designated by a local authority as a special site. For these sites, SEPA will be responsible for securing remediation.

Local Authority strategy
Identification of contaminated land
Remediation

Local Authority Strategy

Under Part IIA, local authorities are required to cause their areas to be inspected from time to time to identify contaminated land. The statutory guidance required that local authorities develop and publish a strategic approach to the identification of contaminated land by October 2001 which merits detailed individual inspection. The Scottish Government have also issued advice to local authorities on inspection strategies. The strategy should indicate how the local authority will identify potentially contaminated areas and how these will be prioritised to be assessed in more detail. The identification is to be done as a result of information gathered by the local authority and information received from other regulatory bodies, organisations or individuals.

Identification of Contaminated Land

It is the responsibility of local authorities to determine whether any particular site is contaminated land, based on the outcome of their assessment and on the balance of probabilities that one or more significant pollutant linkages are present. In making their assessment, local authorities are required to consult with the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) regarding the determination of pollution of the water environment and with Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) concerning harm to ecological systems. In the process of identification, appropriate persons may be contacted for information by the local authority.

If a local authority does not have sufficient information to arrive at a decision, then it may undertake a detailed investigation of the land. Local authorities can undertake, or authorise others to undertake, an inspection using statutory powers of entry. Compensation may be payable by the local authority for any disturbance caused.

Local authorities are required to give notice of land identified as contaminated (or designated as a special site) to: SEPA; the owner of the land; any person who appears to the local authority to be in occupation of the whole or any part of the land; and each person who appears to the authority to be an appropriate person. The notifications of contaminated land are required to be placed on the public register. There is no mechanism for Appropriate Persons to appeal against a local authority's decision that land is contaminated or a special site.

For more information:

Remediation

The process of securing remediation comprises a number of stages. There is at least a three month consultation period (bypassed in cases where urgent remediation is justified) following identification of contaminated land, or designation as a special site. During this period, the enforcing authority, site owner, occupier and other appropriate persons should reach decisions on the remediation mechanisms.

There are in general four possible outcomes of the consultations:

  1. the appropriate person agrees to undertake remediation and issues a remediation statement, in consultation with the enforcing authority.
  2. the enforcing authority serves a remediation notice on the appropriate person/s, where no indication is provided that appropriate remediation will be undertaken.
  3. the enforcing authority uses its powers to undertake remediation itself and issues a remediation statement.
  4. it is unreasonable require remediation and the enforcing authority issues a remediation declaration (if circumstances change after a remediation declaration has been issued, a remediation notice can be subsequently served).

For more information:

What is remediation and what is likely to be required?

The term remediation has a wide meaning under Part IIA, as it includes assessment of condition, undertaking remedial work and monitoring the condition. These actions may well be phased and they may also be used to further characterise identified pollutant linkages, in order to inform the requirements for remedial work. The aim of remedial works should be to remove the pollutant linkage, either by reducing or removing the contamination source, breaking the pathway or removing the receptor. The standard of remediation should be such that significant harm or pollution of the water environment is no longer being caused, provided that it is also reasonable with regards to the cost involved and the seriousness of the harm of pollution of the water environment being caused. Enforcing authorities are required to have regard to the Statutory Guidance when deciding whether remediation is reasonable.