|
3.4 Facilitating and Supporting the BPEO
3.4.1 BPEO Infrastructure
Taking forward the implementation of the BPEO will require
a partnership approach between the Waste Strategy Area Group members
(see Figure 4, Section 2) and other stakeholders to achieve the targets
set out above. A significant level of investment and infrastructure
development will be required to ensure that waste produced in Lothian
and Borders is dealt with effectively and sustainably whilst achieving
Best Value. The immediate next steps for the Lothian and Borders Local
Authorities will be to develop more detailed Implementation Plans. These
will provide more localised detail on the necessary actions, costings
and timescales for local delivery of the Area Waste Plan BPEO. It is
also recognised that, in taking forward this BPEO, there will be significant
linkage with the planning system to secure approval for sites and projects.
A number of pilot projects are also likely to be introduced
for waste collection. This will allow detailed evaluation of a number
of options before their long-term establishment. The following table
sets out an indication at this stage of the key facilities required
to meet the BPEO.
Table 14 provides an indication only of the waste management
facilities required to achieve the BPEO for MSW (comparison between
continued growth in waste arisings and stabilisation of MSW arisings).
It should be noted that these may change as contractual arrangements
between Local Authorities and the waste management industry may require
fewer larger, or more smaller scale facilities to achieve the same diversion
targets. The development of any facilities will also seek to achieve
improved economies of scale by processing similar Non-Municipal Wastes
that could increase the capacity of facilities developed. Further work
included in Section 4 of the plan on Non-Municipal Solid Waste
will provide more robust information on the likely impacts of Non-Municipal
Solid Waste reprocessing.
(*The list excludes the need for possible additional transfer
stations and reprocessors)
Table 14 - Implementation of Indicative BPEO Infrastructure
| Treatment |
Capacity at continued waste growth (1) |
Capacity at aspirational stabilisation
of waste by 2020 (2) |
Timescale |
Notes |
| Clean Materials Recycling Facility (MRF) |
147 000 tonnes - 2010
177 000 tonnes - 2013
275 000 tonnes - 2020
|
147 000 tonnes - 2010
173 000 tonnes - 2013
253 000 tonnes - 2020
|
2004 onwards |
Will be required to separate and bulk
up increasing quantities of collected recyclate. |
| Source Segregated Composting Facilities |
54 000 tonnes - 2010
68 000 tonnes - 2013
103 000 tonnes - 2020
|
54 000 tonnes - 2010
66 000 tonnes - 2013
91 000 tonnes - 2020
|
Modular systems phased from 2004 onwards |
Will require in-vessel systems, to deal
with increasing quantities of waste up to 2020. |
| Mixed-Waste Processing Facilities |
200 000 tonnes - 2010
265 000 tonnes - 2013
342 000 tonnes - 2020
|
200 000 tonnes - 2010
260 000 tonnes - 2013
281 000 tonnes - 2020
|
2005 onwards |
Capacity can increase at one facility
through increasing number of operational shifts. Technology will
need to maximise quality of end product where practicable and have
potential to include source segregated composting process. Based
on Sorrain Ceccini technology. |
| Mixed-Waste Stabilisation Facilities |
257 000 tonnes - 2010
144 000 tonnes - 2013
40 000 tonnes - 2020
|
257 000 tonnes - 2010
132 000 tonnes - 2013
18 000 tonnes - 2020
|
2006 onwards |
Initial stabilisation of waste via composting
process to achieve volume reduction. Reduce reliance on this technology
to improve end product and closing the sustainable resource use
loop by working towards a useful end product. |
| Potential Other Treatment |
160 000 tonnes - 2020 |
110 000 tonnes - 2020 |
After 2013 |
2007: technology and confirmation of
required capacity will be made. This can include a range of technologies
such as - gasification, pyrolysis, combined heat and power, refuse-derived
fuel, etc., to recover energy from waste before it is disposed.
These technologies will only form part of an integrated system that
maximises recycling and composting at the front end of the system. |
| Treatment |
Capacity at continued waste growth (1) |
Notes |
| Landfill Capacity for Municipal Solid
Waste |
10.3 million tonnes
Total MSW to be disposed from 2001 2020 |
The Waste Strategy Area Group feel that
it is premature to make a statement on landfill capacity within
the Lothian and Borders, as any robust assessment has to take into
account all wastes that are disposed of at sites that accept MSW,
e.g. non-hazardous commercial and industrial wastes collected by
the private sector.
Whilst an initial assessment of current landfill capacity suggests
that there is sufficient capacity within the Lothian and Borders
for MSW disposal up to 2020, there are a number of issues that must
also be taken into consideration:
- This assessment does not take into account the unknown future
disposal requirements of non-MSW within the Lothian and Borders
up to 2020. Any sites that dispose of MSW will also dispose of non-MSW
that will impact on future availability of disposal capacity.
- The impact of landfill site closures as a result of the Landfill
Directive requirements
- Any increase in waste minimisation has not been taken into account
- All waste collected in the area is assumed to be disposed of within
the area; no imports or exports of waste have been considered.
- Proximity Principle and transport implications within the waste
strategy area have not been taken into account, e.g. it may not
be environmentally beneficial to transport waste from one side of
the waste strategy area to the other, when other options may be
in closer proximity and may even be out with the area. |
Actual capacity required will be dependant on several
variables including waste composition, waste growth, participation in
recycling schemes, the success of waste
prevention schemes and is for municipal solid waste only.
1 Based on continued waste growth reference
Table 7, Section 2.2.1
2 Based on aspiration to stabilise growth in waste arisings by
2020 reference 9a and 9b section 2.4.1
3.4.2 Indicative Cost of Implementing the BPEO
The costings below provide a comparison of indicative
costs involved in the implementation of the BPEO for Municipal Solid
Waste against actual costs of MSW management in 1999 (as reported to
the Scottish Executive, source SWMBA), MSW management costs at continued
waste growth (no waste minimisation) and MSW management at stabilisation
of waste arising by 2020. The actual costs will ultimately be determined
by a range of factors such as market forces, contract agreements, the
size and location of facilities, funding available, taxes (such as the
landfill tax), transport and labour costs, political factors, etc. The
costs set out below are estimates provided by independent consultants
and show an indication of the significant level of additional funding
that is required to implement the BPEO and highlights the financial
impact of significant levels of waste minimisation.
Table 15 and Table 16 - Indicative Costs (at present
day prices) of BPEO
(at continued growth in waste arisings and a waste minimisation comparison)
Table 15
|
Collection Costs per
year (£000s) |
Treatment/ Disposal Costs
Per year (including landfill tax) (£000s) |
Total Cost Per year (£000s) |
Cost per Tonne per year
No Waste Min (£/tonne) |
Cost per Tonne per year
- Stabilisation of Waste Arising by 2020 (£/tonne) |
1999
(564 000 tonnes MSW Arising) |
12 825 |
11 767 |
24 592 |
44 |
|
By 2010
(667 000 tonnes MSW Arising) |
32 548 |
34 165 |
66 713 |
100 |
100 |
By 2013
(721 000 tonnes MSW Arising) |
36 114 |
38 765 |
74 879 |
104 |
99 |
By 2020
(864 000 tonnes MSW Arising) |
40 874 |
45 743 |
86 617 |
100 |
85 |
The cost per tonne does not take into account revenues
from the sale of recovered materials, but does take into account future
projections in landfill tax as set out in Section 2.3.
Table 16
| |
At Continued 2.62%
Annual Growth in Waste Arisings |
With Increased Waste
Minimisation to Stabilise Growth in Waste Arisings in 2020 |
| Total Cost of Capital investment from
2002 2020 |
£196 million |
£160 million |
| Net Present Value (at current Treasury
Discount Rate at date of AWP publication) |
£818 million |
£771 million |
Continued growth in waste arisings model is based on
Table 7 in Section 2.2.1
The waste-stabilisation model is based on example of waste prevention
set out in Figure 6 and Figure 7 in Section 2.5.1.
The focus of the process to establish the BPEO was to
find the optimum methods of waste treatment that should be used to at
least meet the three landfill reduction targets set by the Landfill
Directive (i.e. permitted to landfill 75%, 50% and 35% of 1995 levels
of biodegradable municipal waste sent to landfill, by 2010, 2013, and
2020 respectively). In the light of the draft AWPs published in spring
2002, the Executive has calculated that an interim overall national
target of recycling and composting of 25% of waste collected by local
authorities is achievable by 2006 by implementation of AWPs, and has
allocated adequate funding to achieve that target. The indicative costings
set out in this plan will be further refined in each of the local authorities
implementation plans for the purpose of Strategic Waste Fund bids. Further
information on national costings is provided in the National Waste Plan
(2003). Authorities will be expected to seek grant support from the
Strategic Waste Fund (£230 million for the financial years 2003/04,
2004/05, 2005/06) to assist with the additional costs of implementing
the AWPs and will be expected to ensure that delivery of the plans will
contribute to the 2006 targets by early implementation of recycling
and composting systems.
3.4.3 BPEO Employment Opportunities
An estimation has been made of the total number of people
who will be employed in the waste industry in the area if the BPEO is
implemented. This is projected to increase to 1500 in 2010 and 2500
in 2020. This includes employment in construction of new waste management
infrastructure.
3.4.4 Recycling Market Development
It is clear that if Scotland is to make better progress
in recycling and the targets within the BPEO are to be achieved, significant
effort must be made to develop both national and local markets using
recycled materials. Progress can also be made in improving the logistics
of supply to markets outside Scotland. The UK national WRAP (Waste Resources
Action Programme) and ReMaDe (Recycling Market Development) programmes
have been established to promote sustainable waste management through
the creation of stable markets for recycled materials and products and
by removing barriers to waste minimisation, reuse and recycling.
The ReMaDe Scotland (Recycling Market Development www.remade.org.uk)
programme was established in 1999 to identify potential markets and
uses for recovered materials in Scotland. It is the key focal point
for recycling market development in Scotland and is seeking to increase
recovery of waste, create jobs, support the Area Waste Plan and local
recycling businesses through encouraging investment, supporting local
partnerships and engaging in wider awareness in uses of recovered materials.
WRAP (Waste Resource Action Programme www.wrap.org.uk)
is a £40m UK-wide programme funded for 3 years (established in
2001) to change attitudes to waste minimisation and recycling through
the creation of stable and efficient markets for recycled materials
and products. The programme is looking at material-specific research
and development projects, compost standards, delivering training programmes
and government procurement. WRAP is working closely with ReMaDe and
other organisations, addressing barriers to recycling including market
development; supply chain issues, investment packages to reduce business
risk in new technologies and processes, and is supporting the development
of recycling infrastructure.
The Waste Strategy Area Group will continue to support
local applications to WRAP and other market development grant funding.
The development of local recycling markets has the potential
to bring local economic opportunities to the area. This is a particular
area in which the local enterprise network have a key role in forward
development.
ReMaDe and the Local Enterprise Network will be required
to provide ongoing monitoring of the local business development opportunities
when providing information on proposed indicators 4 and 9 as set out
in Table 20 Section 5.5.2.
3.4.5 Education and Awareness Raising
The National Waste Strategy: Scotland makes it clear that
there needs to be a fundamental shift in attitudes and behaviour of
all waste producers in Scotland. There must be an integrated effort
on promotion and education to ensure that both householders and businesses
are fully aware of the objectives of the Area Waste Plan and have an
opportunity to contribute, particularly to the proposed waste recycling
and recovery arrangements, and waste minimisation initiatives.
The Waste Strategy Area Group is clear that the key element
to effecting change in waste management is to improve awareness and
attitudes to waste. This was reinforced by the consultation responses
where the fundamental awareness of what happens to waste after it is
collected is very low. Any future educational campaigns are, therefore,
starting from the very basic level and will be co-ordinated through
the Lothian and Borders Waste Aware working group a multi-stakeholder
group of the key partners that can deliver waste awareness at the local
level.
Action 17
Through the Lothian and Borders Waste Aware Group, develop an integrated
waste awareness campaign across the whole waste strategy area.
The Lothian and Borders Waste Aware Group will plan and
facilitate public awareness campaigns throughout the area, closely linked
to local service and infrastructure development. The campaigns will
be delivered through close working with the Scottish Waste Awareness
Group (SWAG) and in partnership with key stakeholders, including the
Local Authorities, SEPA, the private waste industry sector and Non-Governmental
Organisations. All local campaigns will also link in with those being
undertaken across Scotland to ensure consistency of campaigning messages
and maximise educational impact.
The Waste Aware Lothian and Borders programme
will work towards changing public attitudes and behaviour towards domestic
waste management. A baseline survey was conducted during summer 2001
as part of the phase one consultation on the AWP options, when a total
of 1250 householders were interviewed on their current waste practices.
The findings of this survey will be crucial in developing effective
promotional materials, informing project development and tailoring services
to local needs.
Campaigns will focus on a specific waste management issues
for the Waste Strategy Area and run concurrently with the implementation
of the Lothian and Borders Area Waste Plan.
They will comprise of three basic stages:
1. Before survey to
assess attitudes and behaviour towards the identified waste minimisation
issue prior to the intervention strategy.
2. Campaign intensive
localised intervention strategy run initially for a 6-month period working
in partnership with the WSAG, Local Authorities, retailers, private
waste industry, local community and voluntary groups.
3. After survey to
assess attitudes and behaviour towards the identified waste minimisation
issue after the intervention strategy and to appraise the effectiveness
of the different campaign methods employed.
This format will allow the monitoring of progress towards
waste prevention, development of good practice models and best value
for changing public attitudes to waste reduction, reuse and recycling.
The process also aims to engage stakeholders in assessing local waste
management challenges and involve them in developing viable solutions.
The Councils within the Lothian and Borders Area presently
deliver a host of local public information services with the aim of
increasing environmental awareness, sustainable development, improved
health and citizenship. There is potential for the Waste Strategy Area
Group to link up with these initiatives and promote the understanding
of these issues through participation in local projects.
For example:
i. The Eco Schools Programme
is an award scheme, which recognises participating schools that have
made a commitment to and are working towards improving their environmental
performance. It is also a learning resource, raising awareness and understanding
of complex issues through activities that link to curriculum subjects.
Todays children are future householders and resource
consumers. Through targeting education and awareness in schools throughout
the Lothian and Borders, good practice can be ingrained within the culture
of future adults. There are many opportunities to integrate waste minimisation
and recycling into curriculum activities through both theoretical and
practical subjects. Local Authorities have a key role in ensuring schools
are supported in developing and integrating these subject areas. The
Scottish Executive Education Department have adopted the Eco Schools
programme as a performance measure for one of their national priorities
in education: National Priority 4 Values and Citizenship.
Action 18
Local Authorities in partnership with Keep Scotland Beautiful will
support the implementation of Eco Schools.
The community recycling sector is also fundamental in
the local delivery of education and awareness campaigns. An example
within the Lothian and Borders is the work of Lothian and Edinburgh
Environmental Partnership (LEEP) who are also members of the Waste Strategy
Area Group. This Not-for-Profit organisation carries out a range of
waste prevention and recycling initiatives in the area that are supported
by initiatives such as educational visits to schools and the printing
and circulation of 20 000 copies of the Too Good To Waste
Recycling Directory. All future campaigns will be linked into and build
on the work of active community groups in the area.
Action 19
Develop and print a Lothian and Borders Waste Minimisation Guide/Directory.
The development of new infrastructure as part of
the BPEO implementation presents an ideal opportunity to raise awareness
of waste issues and increase understanding of the complexities of managing
waste.
Action 20
Development of an education centre in midlothian as part of the proposed
waste management complex at Drummond Moor to cater for school visits
and community groups.
It is recognised that there is already a great deal of
information and guidance available to raise awareness of waste-related
issues. With the production of further materials associated with local
campaigns, it is essential that the communication of such information
is accessible to all.
Action 21
Maintain via SEPAs NWS internet site, electronic information
on the Area Waste Plan and link into other related web sites in the
area to provide an information network on local waste-related issues.
3.4.6 Community Involvement
The current and future role of the community recycling
sector in Scotland cannot be underestimated both in terms of helping
to achieve landfill diversion targets and also in terms of training,
employment and urban regeneration. This sector delivers frontline services
community groups also provide employment and training opportunities,
and provides work-training placements for the long-term unemployed and
people with special needs.
In recognition of the growing importance of this sector,
a Scottish Community Recycling Network, has been established. The key
objectives of this network are to provide support and advice to the
existing and developing community groups across Scotland as well as
addressing issues of concern. The network will also seek to identify
individual groups, highlight best practice and promote long-term sustainability
within the sector.
The Network proposes a mechanism for delivering local
support and information dissemination. These local networks will be
run as part of the national framework but will benefit from a shared
pool of resources, knowledge and experience. A local structure will
focus on:
- identifying the active community groups in any
given area and their respective levels of operation and coverage
- providing regular meetings and surgeries to workshop
ideas and practices
- helping identify new groups and projects
- providing capacity building, business and project
planning advice
- assisting in identifying and applying for funding
- acting as a liaison between community groups
and Local Authorities, SEPA, private sector.
Action 22
Investigate sources of potential funding and develop a local voluntary
sector network.
|