Lothian and Borders Area Waste Plan

Lothian and Borders Area Waste Plan

SEPA :: Home Page
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer
spacer   spacer
 

4.2 Local Framework For Non-Municipal Solid Wastes

 

4.2.1 Waste Data

The lack of comprehensive and reliable waste arisings data (i.e. waste types and quantities), a situation not unique to the Lothian and Borders area, has restricted the local planning process for non-MSW at this stage of developing the first Lothian and Borders Area Waste Plan. In order to plan effectively for the management of these wastes, a complete and robust data set will be required. The quarterly surveys of licensed waste management facilities by SEPA’s waste data team will, in time, deliver an improved database for all of Scotland’s waste.

The Lothian and Borders WSAG will establish a programme to fill this data gap locally as part of the national framework, to ensure provision of sufficient forward capacity for the management of these waste arisings. This will include appropriate consultations and surveys with key local industry groupings over a period of time to measure the arisings of all controlled wastes in the area. A review of the capacity and type of existing facilities can then be carried out and the forward capacity required to maintain an adequate network of facilities identified on the basis of the current management systems for these wastes. It is expected that this ongoing consultation process will also help to identify and establish local markets for recycled materials (see Section 4.3.1.).

Action 24
Waste Strategy Area Group will work with SEPA’s Waste Data Team to improve data on all wastes.

Action 25
SEPA’s Waste Data Team will undertake surveys with registered exemptions (initial focus on paragraphs 2, 9, 19, 24 of the Waste Management Licensing Regulations and provide Lothian and Borders data on these wastes.

It is also recognised that the Enterprise Network support agencies (e.g. Local Enterprise Companies, Business Environment Partnership) have a key role to play in raising awareness within local businesses of the benefits of measuring and monitoring the quantities of waste that they produce. Further national work is required to establish data systems to record and monitor waste arisings from waste producers.

 

4.2.2 Specific Local Waste Streams

Priority Waste Stream Projects
Of the 13 identified Priority Waste Stream Projects for Scotland, the following have been completed and information extracted from each of the output reports relating specifically to the Lothian and Borders Waste Strategy Area.

Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste
As can be seen from Figure 3 (Section 1.5) Lothian and Borders Waste Arisings, this waste stream is the largest single source of waste due to its high density. A study carried out for the whole of Scotland in 2001 estimates C&D arisings in the Lothian and Borders in 2000 to be 1055 000 tonnes with approximately 269 000 tones (about 25%) being recovered through crushing and screening, road planning and hand picking. Around 612 000 tonnes is disposed of to landfill and 175 000 tonnes disposed of via exempt sites. See figure below for breakdown by percentage.

Figure 11- Lothian and Borders Construction and Demolition Waste (2000)

Figure 11

The study identified that nationally around 37% of the landfilled C&D Waste could be recycled. Realising this potential locally would create a further 226 000 tonnes of secondary aggregate that could replace virgin aggregate used for construction in the Lothian and Borders. The current infrastructure for these wastes can be found within the SEPA Priority Waste Stream Report (availability in annex4) or can be located on the CIRIA Internet Register of Recycling Sites (http://www.ciria.org.uk).

Through improved resource management of the construction industry, preventing or reducing the production of waste will have the maximum positive environmental impact, through reduced resource use, lower emissions and energy consumption. A full set of recommendations is detailed in the Construction and Demolition Priority Waste Stream Project Report – Data, Best Practice and Recommendations (see Annex 4 for availability).

Action 26
Establish ongoing data monitoring programmes for C&D wastes utilised under waste management licensing exemptions.

Action 27
Councils and private sector demolition and waste management companies will investigate further provision of local facilities for the segregation of C&D wastes through partnership working wherever possible.

Tyres
The national data study on tyres collected data from the companies making up the tyre industry in Scotland (see Appendix 4 of the study). The data collected were incomplete and therefore the arisings were also calculated using a predictive model. Arisings in 1999 for the Lothian and Borders has been estimated at a total of 5576 tonnes. These breakdown into 3 categories: 1) 4240 tonnes – discarded due to replacement, 2) 1310 tonnes from end-of-life Vehicles and 3) 26 tonnes reported as illegally dumped. Used tyre arisings in the Lothian and Borders accounts for nearly 20% of Scotland’s arisings. This figure is further broken down into arisings by car, small truck and large truck in the study.

Nationally, around 3% of tyres are reused, 13% recycled (via retreading and silage clamps/landfill engineering), and 49% landfilled. Of those tyres arising in Lothian and Borders in 1999, 20% were landfilled. The remainder are thought to be mainly exported as part worn tyres or for other reuse. It should be noted, however, that since 1999 the situation is less bleak in that very few tyres arising in Scotland are now being landfilled. Direct and significant markets are now available with Lafarge Cement UK (formerly Blue Circle Cement Kiln in Dunbar) who use tyres as a coal substitute, and use of old tyres within landfill sites for engineering purposes, e.g. leachate drainage layer.

Implementation of the Landfill Directive will see a ban on whole tyres to landfill by July 2003 and shredded tyres by 2006.

Newsprint
An integral part of both municipal and commercial waste streams, this project examined newsprint in the context of its suitability for recycling, its quantity and potential to stimulate large scale industrial investment in Scotland, through the manufacture of newsprint from recovered materials.

The total newsprint waste arisings in Scotland in 1999 is estimated to have been approximately 240 000 tonnes – 6% printers waste, 11% over issue to sales outlets and 83% post consumer (based on sales data). The extent of post-consumer newsprint waste arisings in the Lothian and Borders in 1999 was estimated at 34 307 tonnes.

Recovery of newsprint is estimated at 75% printers waste, 100% of over issues and 14% of post-consumer newsprint arisings for the whole of Scotland.

It is estimated that the requirements of the Landfill Directive targets to divert Biodegradable Municipal Waste from landfill will require the recovery of between 150 000 and 230 000 tonnes per year of newsprint waste by 2016, requiring a five- to eightfold increase in recovery above current levels. It is unlikely that this will result in new mill capacity being developed in Scotland but a number of other potential outlets have been identified as:

  • Cellulose insulation materials
  • Manufacture of waste newspaper briquettes for use as fuel
  • Animal bedding
  • Compost

These outlets can be developed as new reprocessing opportunities within the Lothian and Borders but would required a stable and guaranteed supply of materials, that will require co-ordination and co-operation between Local Authorities and private sector organisations.

End-of-Life Vehicles (ELVs)
There are two different categories of this waste stream:

  • Premature ELVs – processed by insurance companies, end of life determined by damage as a result of an accident, fire, flood or theft.
  • Old ELVs – processed by Local Authorities and private owners/vehicle retailers, determined when a vehicle comes naturally to the end of its life, when it is between 10 and 14 years old.

The national study on ELVs estimates 1999 arisings in the Lothian and Borders (cars and light goods vehicles) to be 29 285 vehicles, equating to 28 699 tonnes (at 0.98 tonnes average weight of an ELV).

Of these 2604 vehicles (9%) were premature ELVs, 1483 vehicles (5%) were abandoned ELVs (recovered by Local Authorities) and 25 148 vehicles (86%) were private ELVs.

Current infrastructure indicates that there are 42 dismantlers/scrap yards/metal recyclers in the waste-strategy area.

The report identifies Best Practice under the requirements of the End-of-Life Vehicle Directive that includes:

  • Design of vehicles
  • Recycling/recovering component parts before shredding
  • Recycling/recovering material from shredder residue.

Other Local Priority Wastes
Through consultation with waste producers and industry in the Lothian and Borders the following wastes have been identified as local priority wastes:

  • Exempt activity wastes
  • Plastics
  • Computer Wastes
  • Agricultural Wastes
  • Wood
  • Paper/Cardboard
  • Oil
  • Metal
  • Hazardous Waste

Annual reporting on the area waste plan will identify future actions and outcomes on these waste streams in the Lothian and Borders.

Action 28
Carry out waste composition analysis and identify best practice for local sustainable management of these local priority wastes (see above).

City of Edinburgh Council currently undertakes a collection service for hazardous household materials and are working with SEPA and other authorities on the potential expansion of this service. Midlothian Council is taking part in the National Hazardous Household Waste Priority Waste Stream Project for hazardous household wastes.

Action 29
Midlothian Council will undertake a pilot Hazardous Household Waste Scheme (as part of a National Project) and the results will be used to inform further expansion of the service throughout the area.

 

4.2.3 Waste Prevention

It must be recognised that to realise any waste prevention targets a co-ordinated effort with government and industry is fundamental with a potential requirement for further regulatory and economic instruments, increased education and awareness, and other measures to increase the responsibility of producers to minimise their waste. Of the 202 businesses consulted with during phase one of the Area Waste Plan development, nearly 60% of respondents identified the reduction of waste at source as the preferred future sustainable option for their wastes. Waste prevention tools include pre-product design, changes to management and production processes, and the development of clean or wasteless technologies.

There is a clear and well-defined methodology for carrying out waste minimisation or resource efficiency that commerce and industry can adopt in Scotland. This involves using a systematic approach where a company identifies the true cost of waste by carrying out an audit, sets waste-reduction targets and develops an action plan that would look at improvement opportunities. There are good examples of successful projects in the Lothian and Borders where the environmental and financial benefits of waste minimisation have been demonstrated. These include:

  • Borders Machinery Ring – Agricultural Waste Project
  • Business Environment Network
  • Resource Efficiency Action Programme (REAP) – phase 2 of the East of Scotland Waste Minimisation Project
  • Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Waste Minimisation and Environmental Management Initiative (Business Environmental Partnership)

  • Success In Sustainability Programme (Business Environmental Partnership)
  • Environmental Placement Programme (Business Environmental Partnership and Shell Technology Enterprise Programme)
  • South of Scotland Business Efficiency Initiative McMerry Sustainability Partnership.

Through this well-established network, and a comprehensive database of interested companies developed as part of an extensive consultation process, waste producers are well represented in the development of the plan and the task now is to engage a further number of companies in waste prevention.

Action 30
SEPA’s Waste Minimisation Initiative (WaMI) is seeking contribute to the Environmental Mentoring Programme for the Lothian and Borders in association with various utilities in Scotland.

Action 31
Promote and support the actions of:
a) Business Environment Partnership
b) REAP (Resource Environment Action Programme)
c) Scottish Enterprise Edinburgh and Lothians
d) Scottish Borders Enterprise.


4.2.4 Reuse and Refurbishment

Waste from one commercial/industrial process may be a useful material that can be used within another process, a fundamental concept of the sustainable management of resources. Of the 202 businesses that responded to the Waste Producers Consultation, 143 agreed that services to sell or exchange wastes would be useful. There are also significant opportunities in the refurbishment and reuse of office furniture and computer/telecom equipment, especially for reuse by community organisations, Not-for-Profit sector, and small new business start-ups that have limited resources for new office equipment.

Action 32
Establish a Waste Exchange in the Lothian and Borders building on current local practice established in the Scottish Borders by SISTech.

4.2.5 Recycling and Composting

The development of commercial recycling services have the potential to maximise the overall benefits and feasibility of household recycling services, and will be encouraged wherever possible. Examples of integrated recycling schemes include:

  • Office paper and cardboard recycling
  • Glass recycling from pubs and clubs
  • Composting of canteen, food processing, landscape gardening, agricultural wastes
  • Plastic, steel and aluminium container recycling

  • Oils, solvents and batteries
  • Ferrous and non-ferrous metals.

The community sector play an important role in providing local recycling services for businesses. LEEP run a substantial office paper and cardboard collection scheme for 300 businesses in Edinburgh and have just received landfill tax funding to extend the service and create a sustainable future for the project. It is also anticipated to extend the materials collected to include such items as fluorescent tubes. LEEP also run Cash for Cans collections from businesses in Edinburgh and Lothian areas.

LEEP is investigating and hoping to be involved in future WEEE collection services in the area following an initial pilot that was carried out in 1997/1998.

Consultation with the local business community has highlighted that, whilst many are willing to participate in recycling, the lack of local facilities, on-site storage, current financial benefits and information on markets for sorted wastes is preventing increased participation. Improved availability of services and cost savings were the two highest responses to encourage businesses to recycle more of their wastes.

 

4.2.6 Other Recovery

If the Waste Strategy Area Group decides to pursue development of processes to recover energy from MSW, then the possibility of dealing with a wider range of wastes may become available. Such wastes could include:

  • Clinical waste
  • Special waste
  • Oily waste
  • Tyres

  • Sewage sludge
  • Shredder residues

  • Agricultural waste
  • Industrial sludges.

It should be noted that the actual wastes treated would depend on their nature, the technology of the plant chosen and the economics of managing the wastes.

 

4.2.7 Disposal

Private sector companies collect the remaining waste arisings in the area. Under the current Landfill Directive definitions of MSW, biodegradable commercial wastes collected by the private sector are not obligated under the same diversion requirements. Wastes that if collected by the Local Authority would be subject to treatment under the Landfill Directive targets. Private-sector collected wastes will also not be affected by any statutory recycling and recovery targets that are being developed for MSW.

As data improve on the arising of private sector collected wastes, the identification of forward disposal capacity for all wastes can be adequately assessed. See Action 2, section 2.4.1

 
spacer
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer