National Waste Strategy

Tayside Area Waste Plan

SEPA :: Home Page
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer
spacer   spacer
 

3.5 Implementing the Best Practicable Environmental Option

Taking forward the implementation of the BPEO will require an ongoing partnership approach between the Tayside local authorities and other stakeholders to achieve the targets set out above. The Tayside AWP also seeks to achieve Best Value from the infrastructure and investment that is already in place. The importance of an effective DERL energy from waste plant to achieving the BPEO cannot be overstated. The immediate next steps for the Tayside local authorities will be to work up more detailed implementation plans that will flesh out the necessary actions, costs and timescales. It is also recognised that in taking forward this BPEO that there will be significant linkage with the land use planning system to secure approval for sites and projects. A number of pilot projects are also likely to be introduced for waste collection methods. This will allow evaluation of a number of options before firming up on those methods and technologies, which would represent Best Value for Angus, Dundee City and Perth & Kinross councils. Table 3.6 sets out an indication of the key facilities identified at this stage that are required to meet the BPEO targets set out in Figure 3.4 and which will have land use planning implications. The capacity of the required infrastructure could increase if surplus capacity is built in to enable waste from other sources to be accepted.

Table 3.6 - Indicative Infrastructure required to implement Tayside BPEO for Municipal Solid Waste

Requirements Total Capacity Required (1) Timescale Notes
Expansion of mini recycling points Dependant on coverage of kerbside segregated collections. Phased from 2003 to 2020 – see Table 3.2 Plan to draw up strategy and identify sites.
Clean material recovery facility MRF) 61,000 tonnes – 2010
84,000 tonnes – 2013
127,500 tonnes – 2020
2006 onwards Likely to require 1 or 2. One may make more economic sense. Will be required to separate and package increasing quantities of collected recyclate. Dundee and Perth most likely locations and preferably next to railhead.
Composting facilities 34,000 tonnes – 2010
39,000 tonnes – 2013
52,000 tonnes – 2020
Modular systems phased from 2004 onwards Will require in-vessel systems, which will need to be able to deal with increasing quantities of waste up to 2020. It is possible that single large in-vessel plant may make more sense for kitchen putrescibles.
Landfill capable of taking non hazardous waste 122,000 tonnes – 2010
109,000 tonnes – 2013
92,500 tonnes – 2020
  Likely new landfill for non-hazardous wastes required around 2013

(1) Capacity required will be dependent on several variables including waste composition, waste growth, participation in recycling schemes, and success of waste prevention schemes. Capacities are only for MSW, these capacities will increase if other wastes are managed at these facilities. Facilities, which accept wastes other than MSW, will require larger capacity.

In addition to the above the following actions are considered necessary to implement the BPEO:

 
spacer
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer