National Waste Strategy

Tayside Area Waste Plan

SEPA :: Home Page
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer
spacer   spacer
 

5.5 Monitoring the Implementation of the Area Waste Plan

Monitoring and review of the AWP performance will be an important element in measuring the influence and success of the plan. This will ensure that the plan continues to be effective and deliver the improvement in waste management at both the Tayside and national level.

An annual AWP progress report will be provided to the Scottish Executive, and made available on the web site with a summary of the annual forward development plans. This will highlight progress on implementing the AWP and flag up key issues that need to be addressed by a future review of the plan.

Given that the municipal solid waste (MSW) best practicable environmental option (BPEO) process was a rigorous and consensual process, involving all local authorities and a range of other key stakeholder bodies, it is proposed that the aggregated figures from the AWPs should form the basis for national recycling and recovery MSW targets. It is also proposed that the targets post-2010 should be reviewed in line with revised AWPs. This would take into account the progress made in achieving the 2010 target and issues such as the future adoption of new technologies and application of legislation.

 

5.5.1 Application of Municipal Solid Waste Targets

The three local authorities within the Tayside area could meet the AWP targets either collectively or individually. Collective working will allow for greater flexibility. However, each authority will have to be clear from the outset what their share of the target tonnage is. This will require a high level agreement between each authority in the waste strategy area. Individual working will not provide the same level of flexibility. Should agreement between local authorities prove difficult to reach, arbitration may be required to split area targets into individual authority targets.

 

5.5.2 Indicators

The Tayside AWP is setting out the forward direction towards making the significant changes that are required to change our ‘throw away’ culture to a more waste-aware, resource-efficient society. The magnitude of this change is substantial and to ensure that the plan becomes a reality, the monitoring and reporting of its implementation will be essential.

A wide range of stakeholders will have a key role to play, not only in the implementation of actions but in the monitoring and communication of progress made and continuing the partnership approach that has been at the heart of the development process to date.

Table 5.1 over sets out the proposed indicators that would contribute towards the National Monitoring framework along with identified sources of information that can be utilised to gather annual data for reporting requirements.

Table 5.1 - Indicators

  Indicator Type (National / WSA / LA Area) Relevance Measure Information Source
1 Waste production National WSA Waste levels must be known for effective forward planning (disposals and treated wastes)
Waste arisings in millions of tonnes, and categorised as per the requirements of the Waste Data Strategy. SEPA: Local Authority Waste Arising Survey, Industry Trend Survey
2 Treatment of MSW National WSA LA Monitor waste treatment against indicative levels set out in National Waste Plan and Area Waste Plans Tonnage of MSW (expressed as a percentage of total tonnage) treated by:
- Recycling
- Composting
- Energy from Waste
- Landfilling
SEPA: Local Authority Waste Arising Survey,
Community Recycling Network
3 Treatment of non-MSW National WSA LA Monitor waste treatment against baseline levels established as part of non-MSW technical assessments groups Tonnage of non-MSW (expressed as a percentage of total tonnage) treated by:
- Recycling
- Composting
- Energy from Waste
- Landfilling
SEPA: industry trend surveys, SESA, Private Waste Management Companies
4 Collection of MSW National WSA LA Monitor public access to recycling collection services Percentage of MSW collected from:
segregated kerbside collections
survival bag collections
number of mini recycling points per 100 households (by LA area)
SEPA: Local Authority Waste Arising survey,
Local Authorities,
Community Recycling Network
5 Landfilling of BMW National WSA LA Monitor compliance with Landfill Directive
Note: this indicator can be derived from Treatment of MSW indicator
Tonnes of BMW expressed as a percentage of BMW produced in 1995 Local Authority Waste Arising Survey,
SEPA data returns
6 Waste Prevention National WSA Stabilisation and reduction of waste growth is essential for successful resource management and to prevent further environmental degradation Production of MSW per household per year (further guidance on how to measure prevention will be produced by the Waste Prevention Working Group: SEPA)
SEPA: Local Authority Waste Arising Survey,
Local Authorities: No of Households
7 Public Awareness National WSA LA Determine effectiveness of environmental awareness campaigns Shifts in public behaviour: percentage aware of and actually participating in recycling and waste prevention Waste Aware Campaign Surveys,
SWAG Baseline surveys
8 Employment in the waste management sector National Local The traditional waste management sector has diversified to include community groups and social inclusion programmes. The total size of the sector is not known Number of employees including environmental taskforce placements within the waste management sector SESA,
Scottish Enterprise,
SEPA,
Local Authorities,
Community Recycling Network

Action 19
Establish a comprehensive framework for monitoring the development and implementation of the AWP. This will take fully into account progress on the national monitoring framework.

Action 20
Establish a multi-stakeholder group to monitor and report on the action plan, targets and indicators. This group will produce an annual public report.

 
spacer
spacer
Contents Page Contents Page
Previous Page Previous Page
Next Page Next Page
spacer