| |
4.2 Specific Waste Streams
Using the Consolidated European Waste Catalogue (August
2002) all listed wastes have been grouped into compatible industry sectors.
These groupings will form the basis of future work on non-MSW. Any links
with the current Priority Waste Stream programme and existing Technical
Guidance, Best Practice, etc., have been made along with possible links
to current BPEO technology options for MSW as set out in the AWP. The
waste groupings are detailed in Table 4.2 below
Table 4.2 Waste Groupings
| |
Waste Grouping |
| A |
Exploration, Mining, Quarrying and Physical/Chemical
Treatment of Minerals |
| B |
Animal/Fish Wastes (Agriculture, Aquaculture,
Hunting, Fishing, Food Preparation/Processing) |
| C |
Plant Wastes (Agriculture, Aquaculture,
Hunting, Fishing, Food Preparation/ Processing, Forestry) |
| D |
Leather, Fur and Textile Industries |
| E |
Petroleum Refining, Natural Gas Purification
and Coal Pyrolysis |
| F |
Wastes from Inorganic Chemical Processes |
| G |
Wastes from Organic Chemical Processes |
| H |
Wastes from Thermal Processes |
| I |
Wastes from Surface Treatments/Coatings
(Metals and Other Materials) |
| J |
Waste Organic Solvents, Refrigerants
and Propellants |
| K |
Waste Packaging (Absorbents, Wiping Cloths,
Filter Materials and Protective Clothing) |
| L |
Wastes not otherwise specified |
| M |
Construction and Demolition Wastes (Soil
from Contaminated Sites) |
| N |
Human and Animal Healthcare Wastes (Research
Wastes/Excluding Kitchen Wastes) |
| O |
Water Industry Wastes (Water/Sewage Treatment
Wastes) |
| P |
Other Waste Industry Wastes |
4.2.1 Prioritisation of Projects
A decision matrix has been developed to classify non-MSW
into high, medium and low priority projects. This has been based on
the following considerations:
- Links to current MSW BPEO proposals
- Sectoral Importance (to the Scottish economy)
- Infrastructure shortfall in Scotland
- Legislative/regulatory priority.
These projects will be managed at either the local or
the national level depending on the geographical distribution of arisings.
Section 4.3 details how this AWP will contribute to the outputs of these
projects.
Technical groups consisting of the key waste producers,
waste managers and other stakeholders specific to each of the sector
groupings will be formed to drive the range of projects forward. The
membership of these groups is very important to ensure ownership and
credibility of the project outputs by those sectors that produce and
manage these wastes for the future. The groups will undertake and commission
work that will seek to provide the following recommended outputs:
- Establish reliable baseline data and existing
regulatory controls
- Report on current practices to deal with waste
- List current facilities and technologies
- Identify emerging technologies and processes
- Recommend good practice and links to existing
best practice guidance
- Provide guidance on identifying local BPEO and the use of
life-cycle analysis
- Identify problematic wastes that may require
further research
- Identify waste-minimisation tools
- Identify skills gaps and training opportunities
- Identify barriers to achieving BPEO and recommendations
to overcome
- Describe benefits and opportunities to implementing
BPEO
- Identify necessary regulatory controls and other
drivers
- Identify any necessary economic and regulatory
impact assessments for the sector
- Identify enterprise opportunities and social
benefits.
4.2.2 Self-Assessment Guidance for BPEO Decision Making
Not all wastes can be addressed as a high priority and
the timetabling of BPEO projects will be over the longer term. There
are opportunities to encourage the widespread use of the BPEO decision-making
processes that consider environmental, economic and social aspects when
dealing with these wastes. The development of generic Self-Assessment
BPEO Guidance for Industry and Commerce will provide a valuable
and consistent process for waste producers, waste industry and waste
regulators alike, when making localised assessments on the best sustainable
options available and the use of life-cycle assessment. In order to
achieve widespread industry ownership and acceptability of the guidance,
it shall be developed in an inclusive manner with consultation involving
key stakeholders and will be undertaken at a national level.
|
|