Water quality results
Scotland has an extensive network of rivers and streams. They
have substantial biodiversity, conservation and economic value, and
SEPA aims to protect and, where appropriate, improve their quality.
In order that progress is made in this task, SEPA has built up an
extensive monitoring network designed to represent the quality of
all significant waters. Thus, river lengths are assigned the
quality of a downstream monitoring point. For the purposes of river
length measurement, the smallest streams with catchments less then
10 km2 have been excluded, except where they are the main source of
a larger river, or they are substantially polluted. This is in
accordance with European conventions, and avoids having to monitor
small streams which may seasonally dry up. The total length of
rivers with a catchment area of 10 km2 or more is 24,404km and
SEPA's efforts are focused here. In 2003, about 800km of these
rivers were considered to be of poor quality or seriously polluted,
with a further 2,400km of only 'fair' quality.
The classification network
In 1974 a river quality classification scheme was developed to
monitor the quality of all rivers in Scotland. Since the formation
of SEPA in 1996 the scheme was has been enhanced to incorporate
developments in technology and science. The scheme is based on a
five point scale and includes all rivers with a catchment area of
10 km2 or more and specific smaller rivers where known pollution
problems exist. This is called the "classification network".
The classification network is divided into river stretches at
confluences and pollution pressures. Every stretch is assigned a
monitoring point where chemical and/or ecological surveys are taken
and the aesthetic appearance recorded. The quality or "class" of a
length of river is calculated from the monitoring point results.
The stretch lengths in each class are added together.
|
River water quality classification
categories
|
|
Class
|
Description
|
2003 lengths (km)
|
|
A1
|
Excellent
|
6815.2 (26.8%)
|
|
A2
|
Good
|
9540.3 (37.5%)
|
|
B
|
Fair
|
2373.8 (9.3%)
|
|
C
|
Poor
|
750.5 (3.0%)
|
|
D
|
Seriously Polluted
|
52.6 (0.2%)
|
|
U
|
Unclassified
|
5903.3 (23.2%)
|
|
|
Total length
|
25435.7
|
Unclassified river stretches are mostly located in rural upland
catchments. It is SEPA's intention that the extent of unclassified
rivers will be progressively reduced to near zero by the time EU
Water Framework Directive systems are in place in 2006. This
process has been underway for a few years, and in 2003 the length
of unclassified rivers was reduced by a further 2752km.
How is the quality of a river determined?
Every stretch is assigned a monitoring point where chemical
and/or ecological surveys are taken and the aesthetic appearance
recorded chemistry results are used where a minimum of 12 samples
is available from the preceding three year period, except in a very
few cases where a significant change in quality occurs in a year
(eg closure of a significant discharge). In this case, a minimum of
12 samples within a single year since the change are required. The
standard chemical quality sampling frequency is six or 12
samples per year, dependent on the type of site. The ecological
assessment is based on data collected from at least two surveys of
invertebrate fauna each year. In some areas where water quality is
"excellent" ecology data is collected once in every three years
unless a problem in water quality is detected. If any problem is
detected in normally clean rivers, this results in immediate
investigation and improvement action and restoration of more
frequent ecology sampling, until water quality is shown to have
been restored.
Aesthetic conditions are based on one year's data from a
minimum of three observations of the extent of litter and
solid waste impact in the river assessed and recorded during
ecological and/or chemical sampling visits
The final allocation of the quality class is based on the lowest
class determined from the chemistry, ecology, aesthetic and
toxicity assessments for the associated monitoring point. No
attempt is made to assign zones of intermediate quality between
stretches differing by more than one class.
The samples on which classification is based are those from the
SEPA's planned routine monitoring programme, whether they are of
normal quality or impacted by a short-term event. Data resulting
from any additional investigative sampling in response to pollution
incidents or complaints are not used.