The water environment and achieving the environmental
improvements
This section summarises the condition of the
water environment in the Argyll and Lochaber area, the improvements
we plan to achieve and the key pressures and impacts that we need
to address. Catchment summaries of the condition of the water
environment, the improvements we plan to achieve and the key
pressures and impacts that we need to address are available
alongside this document on the SEPA website.
Information on individual water bodies can be
accessed through the web based interactive map on SEPA’s website.
Information on the classification, pressures,
objectives and measures for the Scotland river basin district, as
well as detailed supplementary information on how we classify and
how objectives have been set, can be found in the Scotland river
basin district plan.
The current condition of the water environment
The water environment includes all rivers,
lochs, estuaries, coastal waters, artificial waters (such as canals
and reservoirs) and groundwater. It also includes all the wetlands
that depend on surface waters or groundwater for their water
needs.
The classification process assesses the
current condition of all water bodies over a certain size (rivers
with a catchment area of more than 10 km2 and lochs
which have a surface area greater than 0.5 km2) and all
estuaries and coastal water bodies regardless of size. These are
referred to as baseline water bodies. River and lochs smaller than
the size threshold (small water bodies) are not classified, however
actions that partners are taking to protect or improve any aspect
of the water environment are of interest to the Area Advisory
Group.
SEPA has divided waters in the Argyll and
Lochaber advisory group area into 364 surface water bodies (244
rivers, 6 canals, 38 loch water bodies, 73 coastal and 3 estuarine
water bodies) and 20 groundwaters. Classifying the condition of
each water body provides a picture of where the water environment
is in good condition and where improvements need to be made.
For surface water bodies, ecological status is
divided into five classes: high, good, moderate, poor and bad. This
encompasses the spectrum, from water bodies in a near natural
condition which are at high ecological status to those whose
ecological quality has been severely damaged and which are at bad
ecological status. Water bodies which have been significantly
altered for human uses, eg for hydropower generation, are known as
‘heavily modified’. They are classified according to the same
spectrum of five classes, but by ecological potential instead of
status. This is a measure of the extent to which the water bodies'
ecological quality has been maximised given the limits imposed by
the physical modifications (eg a dam) necessary for the bodies'
use. The same assessment applies to artificial water bodies such as
canals. For more information on heavily modified and artificial
water bodies see Chapter 4 of the Scotland river basin district
plan.
The classification of groundwater describes
whether or not it is polluted, and whether or not the volume of any
water being abstracted from it is sustainable without significant
impacts on rivers or wetlands that depend on the groundwater.
Unlike the five status classes applying to surface waters, two
classes are used to describe the status of groundwater, good and
poor.
The objectives of the Water Framework
Directive are to improve any failing water bodies to good or high
status and to prevent deterioration of those already at good or
high.
The results show a positive picture in the
Argyll and Lochaber area as 73% of all water bodies are at good or
high ecological status or potential (Table 2 and Map 2).
Due to the generally rural, undeveloped nature
of the area there are whole catchments where all the water bodies
are at good or high ecological potential/status. The 384 water
bodies in Argyll and Lochaber fall into 28 catchments. Of these,
the following eight catchments, which contain a total of 19 water
bodies, have no pressures and are already at good or high
ecological status/potential:
- Fort William coastal;
- Loch Linnhe coastal;
- River Aline;
- River Etive;
- Gigha coastal;
- Iona coastal;
- Luing coastal;
- Easdale coastal.
Sixty coastal and three estuarine water bodies
are also already at high or good ecological status/potential. The
objective for these water bodies is to not deteriorate from good
ecological status/potential.
Of surface waters in the area, 53 (14%) have
been substantially changed in character for important social and
economic purposes such as flood protection, hydropower generation,
land drainage or water storage for drinking water supply. These are
known as heavily modified water bodies. Twenty-eight of these are
at good ecological potential. Another 14 (4%) of surface waters are
artificial: six canal water bodies (the Crinan and Caledonian
Canals are split into separate sections) and eight coastal lagoons.
All of these are at good ecological potential.
In Argyll and Lochaber 100% of the
groundwaters are at good status.
|
Table 2: Condition of surface waters
and groundwater in the Argyll and Lochaber advisory group area in
2008
|
|
2008 condition
|
Number of water bodies
|
|
All water bodies
|
Surface waters
|
Groundwater[1]
|
|
Natural
|
Heavily modified
|
Artificial
|
|
High/Maximum
|
47
|
47
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
Good
|
233
|
171
|
28
|
14
|
20
|
|
Moderate
|
68
|
58
|
10
|
0
|
|
|
Poor
|
10
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
|
Bad
|
26
|
16
|
10
|
0
|
|
|
Totals
|
384
|
297
|
53
|
14
|
20
|
|
Number and proportion good or better (%)
|
280
73%
|
218
73%
|
28
53%
|
14
100%
|
20
100%
|

Map 2: Overall surface water classification for
the Argyll and Lochaber advisory group area 2008 (click for larger
image)
Pressures and risks
The main reasons for water bodies not achieving good status
are:
- flow regulation and abstraction (changes to the natural flow
and/or amount of water in rivers and lochs) caused by hydropower
generation and, to a much smaller extent, public water supply
provision;
- alterations to beds, banks and shores (morphology) caused by
forestry pressures (mainly due to planting close to water bodies),
channel straightening (for drainage on land used for mixed farming
which affects only a small number), and creation of barriers to
fish movement by hydropower generation, road transport and
aquaculture;
- diffuse pollution (pollution coming from a number of dispersed
sources) from phosphorus or organic inputs causing nutrient
enrichment or acidification;
- point source pollution (pollution coming from one identifiable
source such as an outfall pipe) from freshwater aquaculture and
sewage disposal causing nutrient enrichment (only a small
number);
- invasive non-native species - the risk posed by introduction
and expansion of water related invasive non-native species.
This assessment has mainly been based on
assessments against standards to give a broad understanding of the
main pressures across the area. There may be cases, in particular
for diffuse source pollution, where there are several similar
pressures on one water body and some apportionment work is required
to establish the source. The above list does not include all
impacts and there are other issues that will also need to be
addressed through river basin management planning. Diffuse
pollution also presents a risk to protected shellfish growing
waters and actions to investigate these impacts are included
below.
Annex 1 gives an overview of the distribution
of pressures across the area by showing the number of water bodies
in each catchment affected by each pressure. Please note that some
water bodies may be counted twice in these tables, because one
water body may be affected by more than one pressure. Detailed
information on impacts in each catchment, including the water
bodies affected, measures and objectives, is included in the
catchment profiles and in the water body information files, both
available on SEPA’s website.
Objectives for the water environment
As Table 2 shows, the majority of Argyll and
Lochaber’s water environment is in a very good condition. The task
now is to improve the remaining failing water bodies to good
ecological status by 2015 (or, if that is not feasible, over the
first three river basin planning cycles) at the same time as
ensuring no deterioration of any water bodies.
The overall goal of the Scotland river basin
district is for 97% of water bodies to be at good or high
ecological status by 2027. In the Argyll and Lochaber area we aim
to have 371 surface water bodies (96%) at good or high ecological
status by 2027. To achieve that, water bodies currently at good or
high ecological status will be protected from deterioration, and
action will be taken to enhance and restore others. Protecting the
status of a water body does not just mean preventing deterioration
of its overall status, because its status depends on the condition
of the different elements such as the plant community, fish
populations and water quality etc.
Restoring the water environment to good
ecological status will take time, so improvements have been
prioritised over the three river basin planning cycles. For the
small proportion of waters for which achieving good ecological
status by 2027 is not feasible, all reasonably
achievable improvements will be made. Comprehensive progress
reviews will be undertaken during each period and will be reported
in updates of this plan.
Table 3 describes how improvements to the
water environment will be phased and Map 3 shows the location of
improvements. The phasing has been designed so that the pace of
improvement provides the time needed to develop and implement the
necessary technical solutions and to make the required investments
and adjustments without creating disproportionate financial
burdens.
|
Table 3: Condition of water bodies
throughout the river basin planning cycles in the Argyll and
Lochaber area
|
|
|
Total
|
Number and proportion of water bodies
at good or high ecological status/potential (%)
|
Number and proportion (%) of water
bodies remaining less than good by 2027
|
|
2008
|
2015
|
2021
|
2027
|
|
All water bodies
|
384
|
280
73%
|
293
76%
|
316
82%
|
368
96%
|
16
4%
|
|
Rivers – natural
|
203
|
144
71%
|
143
70%
|
161
79%
|
190
94%
|
13
6%
|
|
Rivers –HMWB
|
41
|
21
51%
|
23
56%
|
28
68%
|
41
100%
|
0
|
|
Rivers – artificial
|
6
|
6
100%
|
6
100%
|
6
100%
|
6
100%
|
0
|
|
Lochs – natural
|
26
|
19
23%
|
20
77%
|
20
77%
|
25
96%
|
1
4%
|
|
Lochs – HMWB
|
12
|
7
58%
|
8
67%
|
8
67%
|
12
100%
|
0
|
|
Estuaries
|
3
|
3
100%
|
3
100%
|
3
100%
|
3
100%
|
0
|
|
Coastal waters – natural
|
65
|
52
80%
|
62
95%
|
63
97%
|
63
97%
|
2
3%
|
|
Coasts – artificial
|
8
|
8
100%
|
8
100%
|
8
100%
|
8
100%
|
0
|
|
Groundwater
|
20
|
20 100%
|
20 100%
|
20 100%
|
20 100%
|
0
|

Map 3: Phased improvements in surface water quality over the
three cycles (click for larger image)
Lower (less stringent) objectives than good
status
Lower (less stringent) objectives have been
set for eight water bodies in the Argyll and Lochaber advisory
group area where we believe that good ecological status cannot be
achieved even by 2027. Table 4 lists these and the reasons for the
less stringent objectives.
|
Table 4: Water bodies with less
stringent objectives
|
|
Water body status: current and by
2027
|
Water body name
|
Reason for less stringent
objective
|
|
Moderate, remaining moderate
|
River Clachaig
Abhainn Gleann Lubharnadeal
Corran River
Glenbatrick River
|
Water quality is affected by acid deposition.
The time needed to recover is difficult to predict but, because of
natural conditions, is likely to be beyond 2027.
|
|
Loch Laggan
|
Loch Laggan is connected to Lower Loch Laggan
by the River Spean and both water bodies are affected by hydropower
pressures. Lower Loch Laggan is a Heavily Modified Water body
(HMWB) at good ecological potential. As Loch Laggan is affected by
the same pressures it will be assessed whether it too should be a
HMWB. This will be done in the first river basin planning cycle and
its classification and objective reviewed to aim for an
improvement.
|
|
Kilbrannan Sound
|
These are part of a larger group of water
bodies in the Firth of Clyde that are downgraded to moderate status
due to benthic (sea bed) invertebrate results. Most monitoring
points on which this classification is based are further out in the
Firth of Clyde eg round Ailsa Craig, but there is one point which
is closer to the Argyll side. Trawling pressures may be responsible
for benthic impacts in this area, but more monitoring and
investigation is required to determine the reasons for the impacts.
As this means no pressures have been identified, no environmental
improvement targets could be set in this case. Therefore the water
bodies will default to moderate status until 2027 until a pressure
and solution has been identified.
|
|
Mull of Kintyre – South East
|
|
Bad, improving to moderate
|
Abhainn na h-Uainaire/Abhainn a Chnuic
Bhri
|
Water quality is affected by acid deposition.
The time needed to recover is difficult to predict but, because of
natural conditions, is likely to be beyond 2027.
|
Water bodies where deterioration of status has been
permitted
We have allowed exemptions from the objective
of preventing deterioration in status for eight water bodies in the
Argyll and Lochaber advisory group area, for the reasons shown in
Table 5.
|
Table 5: Water bodies where
deterioration in status has been permitted and reasons
|
|
Water body status current and by
2027
|
Water body name
|
Reason for less stringent
objective
|
|
High to moderate
|
An Dubh Uisge
|
For abstraction and impoundment for hydropower
to benefit sustainable development. All appropriate mitigation
measures in place and there are not significantly better
environmental options.
|
|
High to poor
|
North Garvan River
|
|
High to bad
|
River Esragan
|
|
Good to poor
|
River Callop
|
|
Abhainn Shlatach
|
|
River Finnan
|
|
Good to bad
|
Rannoch River
|
|
Douglas Water
|
Protected area objectives
Many water bodies are also part of protected
areas identified as requiring special protection because of their
sensitivity to pollution or their particular economic, social or
environmental importance. Some water bodies in Argyll and Lochaber
have been designated as protected areas because they:
- support economically important shellfish or
freshwater fish stocks;
- have been designated as bathing
waters;
- provide water for human
consumption;
- support species or habitats identified as
requiring special protection under European legislation.
The objectives for these include any
additional protection needed to achieve the purposes for which the
protected area was established.
In Argyll and Lochaber, many protected areas
are already achieving the goals for which they were established.
The objective for such areas is to protect them from deterioration.
Further environmental improvements are needed for other areas that
are currently not meeting their objectives. Planned improvements to
these protected areas are summarised in Table 6.
Further detail on water dependent protected
areas is available in Chapter 5 of the Scotland river basin
management plan and in the Argyll and Lochaber catchment
summaries.
|
Table 6: Planned improvements to
protected areas in the Argyll and Lochaber AAG area
|
|
Protected area
|
Number and proportion (%) of protected
areas achieving the goals for which they were
established
|
|
Total
|
2008
|
2015
|
2021
|
2027
|
Number and proportion not achieving
goals by 2027
|
|
Conservation of habitats and species
(Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas)
*
|
41
|
34
83%
|
37
90%
|
39
95%
|
41
100%
|
0
|
|
Bathing waters
|
2
|
Machrihanish (excellent)
Ganavan (sufficient)
|
Machrihanish (excellent)
Ganavan (sufficient)
|
Machrihanish (excellent)
Ganavan (sufficient)
|
Machrihanish (excellent)
Ganavan (sufficient)
|
0
|
|
Economically important
shellfish
|
28
|
14
50%
|
14
50%
|
17
61%
|
28
100%
|
0
|
|
Note to Table 6
The projected improvements in protected areas
for economically important shellfish refer to objectives for
bacteria that can contaminate shellfish flesh and prevent harvested
shellfish being marketed unless first treated in a purification
centre. All the water quality conditions required to support
shellfish life and growth are already being achieved.
Loch Ailort was designated as a protected
shellfish water in 2009 so no classification information is yet
available. It may therefore reach good status before 2027.
Figures are given for SACs and SPAs that have
water dependant features and where these features are affected by
water related pressures. Included within sites in “favourable
condition” are sites that are “unfavourable but recovering”; this
is because some features will take a long time to recover even when
all appropriate measures are in place. When a feature is reported
as “unfavourable but recovering”, everything has been done to allow
a feature to recover, but more time is needed before it could be
reported as being in favourable condition.
Bathing waters also have an overall aim to
increase the proportion attaining good or excellent classification
rather than sufficient status.
|
In addition:
- all 80 drinking water protected areas (which
include the 20 ground waters) in Argyll and Lochaber are meeting
their current standards with none at risk of deterioration.
Drinking Water Protected Areas are currently under review and any
changes to designations will be reflected in updates of this
plan;
- there is one nutrient sensitive protected
area established under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive.
These are not assessed against an environmental standard: instead,
compliance is measured in terms of measures taken, such as
improvements to sewage treatment works;
- all 13 protected areas for economically
important freshwater fish (salmonid and cyprinid) in this area are
currently complying with the required standards for water
quality.
Shellfish growing waters and diffuse
pollution
In most cases the reasons for the current shellfish waters
failures are not clear. Further research, including a review of the
Food Standards Agency Sanitary Surveys and possibly source tracking
studies, is required to establish the pressures on these protected
areas and therefore the measures required to improve and achieve
the required standards. This work will be done as part of the
planned diffuse pollution actions which are outlined
below.
- Bodies of groundwater are classed as either good status
or poor status
- Artificial water bodies are man-made water bodies, such
as many canals
- These waters include water bodies that are recovering
from acidification (diffuse pollution), caused by the burning of
fossil fuels in power stations, buildings and vehicles which, as
shown in Table 4, can only recover in the longer term