The water environment and achieving the environmental
improvements
This section summarises the condition of the
water environment in the Clyde advisory group area, the
improvements we plan to achieve and the key pressures and impacts
that we need to address. Catchment level summaries of the condition
of the water environment, the improvements we plan to achieve and
the key pressures and impacts that we need to address are included
in catchment profiles. The catchment profiles will
be produced over the next 6 to 12 months and will be available on
the website.
Information on individual water bodies can be
accessed through the web based interactive map on
SEPA’s website at www.sepa.org.uk/water/river_basin_planning.aspx.
Information on the classification, objectives
and measures for the Scotland river basin district, as well as
detailed supplementary information on how we classify and how
objectives have been set, can be found in the district plan.
The current condition of the water environment
The water environment includes all rivers,
lochs, estuaries, coastal waters, artificial waters (such as canals
and reservoirs) and groundwater. It also includes all the wetlands
that depend on surface waters or groundwater for their water
needs.
Classifying the condition of each water body
provides a picture of where the water environment is in good
condition and where improvements need to be made. SEPA has
subdivided waters in the Clyde advisory group area into 322 surface
water bodies (264 river and canal water bodies, 27 loch water
bodies, 22 coastal and 9 estuarine water bodies) and 44 groundwater
bodies in the Clyde area.
In general, the classification of surface
water bodies describes by how much their condition (“status”),
differs from near natural conditions. Water bodies in a near
natural condition are at high status while those whose ecological
quality been severely damaged are at bad status. The results show
that we have a lot of work to do as the majority of water bodies
are currently at less than good status. 44% of water bodies are in
a good or better condition and almost a third are moderate status
(see Table 2 and Maps 2a and 2b below):
In the Clyde area almost a quarter of our
surface water bodies have been substantially changed in character
for important social and economic purposes such as flood
protection, hydropower generation, navigation, land drainage or
water storage for drinking water supply. These are known as heavily
modified water bodies. Another 3% of surface waters are artificial;
most of these are the Forth and Clyde canal. The classification of
heavily modified and artificial water bodies describes their
ecological potential. This is a measure of the extent to which
water bodies' ecological quality has been maximised, given the
limits imposed by the physical modifications necessary for the
bodies' uses.
The classification of bodies of groundwater
describes whether or not they are polluted and whether or not the
volume of any water being abstracted from them is sustainable
without significant impacts on rivers or wetlands that depend on
the groundwater. Unlike the five status classes applying to surface
waters, two classes are used to describe the status of groundwater,
good and poor.
|
Table 2: Condition of surface waters
and groundwater in the
Clydeadvisory group area in
2008
|
|
2008 condition
|
Number of water bodies
|
|
All water bodies
|
Surface waters
|
Groundwater
|
|
Natural
|
Heavily modified
|
Artificial
|
|
High/Maximum
|
8
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
135
|
88
|
15
|
7
|
25
|
|
Moderate
|
98
|
79
|
18
|
1
|
|
|
Poor
|
85
|
42
|
23
|
1
|
19
|
|
Bad
|
40
|
20
|
20
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
366
|
237
|
76
|
9
|
44
|
|
Proportion good or better (%)
|
39%
|
41%
|
20%
|
78%
|
57%
|

Map 2a: Overall surface water classification for Clyde
advisory group area 2008 (click for larger image)
Map 2b: Overall groundwater classification for Scotland river
basin district 2008 (click for larger image)
Pressures and risks
A wide variety of impacts on the water
environment has been identified. Key impacts that the Clyde
advisory group have identified as of particular interest are:
- urban drainage;
- diffuse pollution from rural sources;
- managing the impacts from our industrial past.
This does not include all impacts and there
are other issues that will also need to be addressed through river
basin management planning. Recording the presence of invasive non
native species and implementing the national work, outlined in the
invasive non native species implantation plan, at a local level
will be a key focus of the group. The impacts of abstraction from
public water supply, for example, are also an issue that the Clyde
area advisory group might undertake in the future. Detailed
information on impacts in each catchment are included in the
catchment profiles and in the water body information files, both
available on SEPA’s website at www.sepa.org.uk/water/river_basin_planning.aspx.
SEPA has identified over 100 catchments in
Scotland that are currently failing to meet environmental
standards outlined in the Water Framework Directive. Fourteen
diffuse pollution priority catchments, containing some of
Scotland’s most important waters (for drinking bathing,
conservation and fishing) have been selected using a risk based
approach for action in the first river basin planning cycle. The
rivers Ayr, Doon, Garnock and Irvine and North Ayrshire coastal
burns are included in the first cycle.
Whilst focusing on these catchments for
diffuse pollution the mitigation of other impacts on the water
environment will be considered, such as changes to beds and banks,
abstractions, flooding and invasive non native species.
Objectives for the water environment
The Clyde advisory group area has improved
significantly over the past twenty or so years. The task now is to
build on this achievement: the overall goal of the Scotland river
basin district is for 97% of water bodies to be in good or better
condition by 2027. In the Clyde area we aim to improve 91% of water
bodies by 2027. To achieve that, water bodies currently at good or
high status will be protected from deterioration, and action will
be taken to enhance and restore others. Protecting the status of a
water body does not just mean preventing deterioration of their
overall status. The overall status depends on the condition of the
different elements (eg plant community, fish populations, water
quality etc).
Restoring waters to good status will take
time, so improvements have been prioritised over the three river
basin planning cycles until 2027. For the small proportion of
waters for which achieving good status by 2027 is not
feasible, all
reasonably achievable improvements will be made. Comprehensive
reviews of progress will be undertaken during each period and will
be reported in updates of this plan.
Table 3 describes how improvements to the
water environment will be phased (illustrated in Maps 3a and 3b).
The phasing has been designed so that the pace of improvement
provides the time needed to develop and implement the necessary
technical solutions and to make the required investments and
adjustments without creating disproportionate burdens.
At present the Clyde estuary has an ambitious
objective to meet good status by 2027. In a complex situation such
as the Clyde, further detailed work is required to determine if
measures are able to achieve good status by 2027. The Glasgow
Strategic Study is currently underway investigating the preferred
solution for the integrated and sustainable strategy for wastewater
treatment and networks in the Glasgow area. It is anticipated that
Water Framework Directive objectives can be delivered in a phased
manner with the ongoing improvements in both sewer networks and
sewage treatment.
|
Table 3: Phased improvements to the
condition of water bodies the Clyde area advisory
group
|
|
|
Proportion of water bodies in a good
or better condition
|
|
2008
|
2015
|
2021
|
2027
|
|
All surface water bodies
|
44%
|
49%
|
61%
|
96%
|
|
Rivers
|
37%
|
50%
|
61%
|
95%
|
|
Lochs
|
11%
|
22%
|
44%
|
100%
|
|
Estuaries
|
78%
|
89%
|
89%
|
100%
|
|
Coastal waters
|
55%
|
55%
|
68%
|
95%
|
|
Groundwater
|
57%
|
66%
|
71%
|
80%
|
Lower (less stringent) objectives than
good status
For 22 water bodies in the Clyde advisory
group area, we believe that good status cannot be achieved even by
2027. For these water bodies, we have set a lower (less stringent)
objective than good status.
In the Clyde area nine groundwater bodies have
lower (less stringent) objectives; their water quality is adversely
affected by pollution arising from past mining activities. Eleven
water bodies have lower (less stringent) objectives because their
water quality is affected by acid deposition. The time needed for
water bodies affected by acid deposition to recover is difficult to
predict and, because of natural conditions (natural recovery time),
is likely to be beyond 2027. One water body has lower (less
stringent) objectives because of hydropower generation (Alt Fionn/
Sput Burn/ Alt Oss) and one because of nutrient enrichment (Loch
Goil).
Water bodies where deterioration of
status has been permitted
We have allowed exemptions from the objective
of preventing deterioration in status for three water bodies in the
Clyde advisory group area: two water bodies in the Douglas water
for abstraction and impoundment for hydropower to benefit
sustainable development, and the Capelrig/ Auldhouse burn for
modification to beds and banks for flood protection purposes.

Map 3a: Phased improvements in surface water
quality over the three cycles (click for larger image)

Map 3b: Phased improvements in groundwater quality over the
three cycles (click for larger image)
Protected area objectives
Many water bodies are also part of protected
areas. The objectives for these include any additional protection
needed to achieve the purposes for which the protected area was
established. Protected areas include waters that:
- support economically important
shellfish;
- have been designated as bathing waters;
- provide water for human consumption;
- support species or habitats identified as
requiring special protection under European legislation.
The three water dependant special areas of
conservation (Loch Lomond woods, Endrick Water and Merrick Kells)
and the four water dependant Special Protection Areas (Inner Clyde,
Black Cart, Ailsa Craig and Arran Moors) in the Clyde advisory
group area all meet favourable conditions.
Many protected areas are already achieving the
goals for which they were established. The objective for these
areas is to protect them from deterioration. Further environmental
improvements are needed for other areas that are currently not
meeting their objectives. Planned improvements to these protected
areas are summarised in below.
|
Table 4: Planned improvements to
protected areas in the Clyde advisory group area
|
|
Protected area
|
Proportion of protected areas
achieving the goals for which they were established
(%)
|
|
2008
|
2015
|
2021
|
2027
|
|
Economically important
shellfish
|
33%
|
50%
|
50%
|
100%
|
|
Bathing waters
|
20%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Note
The projected improvements in protected areas
for economically important shellfish refer to objectives for
bacteria that can contaminate shellfish flesh and prevent harvested
shellfish being marketed unless first treated in a purification
centre. All the water quality conditions required to support
shellfish life and growth are already being achieved.
Bathing waters also have an overall aim to
increase the proportion attaining good or excellent classification
rather than sufficient status.
|
In addition one drinking water protection area
is at risk of deterioration due to impacts relating to pesticide
use for agriculture. There are also 17 nutrient sensitive protected
areas established under the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive.
These are not assessed against an environmental standard. Instead,
compliance is measured in terms of measures taken, such as
improvements to sewage treatment works. There are 15 protected
areas for economically important freshwater fish, 14 for salmonid
catchments and one cyprinid catchment (Forth & Clyde
canal).
- Bodies of groundwater are classed as either
of good status or poor status.