The water environment and achieving the environmental
improvements
This section summarises the condition of the
water environment in the Forth advisory group area, the
improvements we plan to achieve and the key pressures and impacts
that we need to address.
The environmental quality and natural
characteristics of surface waters and groundwater vary widely. To
reflect this variation SEPA has divided the water environment into
water bodies. Detailed information for individual water bodies is
held in the interactive map on the SEPA
website.
Information on the classification, objectives
and measures for the Scotland river basin district, as well as
detailed supplementary information on how we classify and how
objectives have been set, can be found in the district plan.
The current condition of the water environment
The water environment includes all rivers,
lochs, estuaries, coastal waters, artificial waters (such as canals
and reservoirs) and groundwater. It also includes all the wetlands
that depend on surface waters or groundwater for their water
needs.
Classifying the condition of each water body
over a certain size threshold - rivers with a catchment area of
more than 10km2 and lochs which have a surface area
greater than 0.5km2, and all estuaries and coastal water
bodies regardless of size - provides a picture of where the water
environment is in good condition and where improvements need to be
made.
In general, the classification of surface
water bodies describes by how much their condition (“status”)
differs from near-natural conditions. Water bodies in a
near-natural condition are at high ecological status while those
whose ecological quality has been severely damaged are at bad
ecological status. The overall status depends on the condition of
the different elements of the classification (eg the plant
community, fish populations, water quality etc).
SEPA has divided waters in the Forth advisory
group area into 268 water bodies. Currently only 70 (26%) of these
water bodies are at good or high ecological status and 198 (74%)
are classified as being at moderate, poor or bad ecological status.
A significant amount of work is therefore required to restore these
water bodies to good ecological status (see Table 2 and Maps 2a and
2b below).
Of the surface water bodies in the Forth
advisory group area, 43 (around 18%) have been substantially
changed in character for important social and economic purposes
such as flood protection, hydropower generation, navigation, land
drainage or water storage for drinking water supply. These are
known as heavily modified water bodies. A further 10 (around 4%) of
surface water bodies are artificial, including the Forth and Clyde
Canal, the Union Canal and Pond Lagoon (Culross). The
classification of heavily modified and artificial water bodies
describes their ecological potential. This is a measure of the
extent to which the ecological quality of the water body has been
maximised given the limits imposed by the physical and hydrological
modifications necessary for its uses. For more information on
heavily modified and artificial water bodies see Chapter 4 of
the River basin management plan for the Scotland river basin
district
.
The classification of bodies of groundwater
describes whether or not they are polluted and whether or not the
volume of any water being abstracted from them is sustainable
without significant impacts on rivers or wetlands that depend on
that groundwater. Unlike the five status classes applying to
surface waters, two classes are used to describe the status of
groundwater: good and poor.
|
Table 2: Status of surface waters and
groundwater in the Forth advisory group area
|
|
2008 status
|
Number of water bodies
|
|
All water bodies
|
Surface waters
|
Groundwater
|
|
Natural
|
Heavily modified
|
Artificial
|
|
High/Maximum
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
69
|
41
|
4
|
7
|
17
|
|
Moderate
|
64
|
54
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
Poor
|
111
|
73
|
26
|
|
12
|
|
Bad
|
23
|
17
|
6
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
268
|
186
|
43
|
10
|
29
|
|
Number and
proportion good or better (%)
|
70
26%
|
42
23%
|
4
9%
|
7
70%
|
17
59%
|

Map 2a: Current surface water classification
for Forth advisory group area (click for larger image)

Map 2b: Current groundwater classification for
Scotland river basin district (click for larger
image)
Pressures and risks
A wide variety of pressures and impacts on the
water environment have been identified within the Forth advisory
group area, reflecting the mixture of urban and rural land use. The
following key pressures are found within the Forth advisory group
area.
Physical (morphological) changes to
water bodies
A large number of water bodies have been
physically altered from their natural state and there are often
multiple physical pressures within each water body, particularly in
our urban areas. Every water body in the Almond catchment has
morphological pressures and it is a key issue within the Esk, Allan
Water, Tyne, Water of Leith and Leven catchments.
Barriers to fish passage
Obstructions which prevent fish moving through
a catchment affect a high proportion of water bodies within the
Forth advisory group area. An impassable barrier low down in the
catchment will cause a failure for each upstream water body within
that catchment. This is currently an issue within the Tyne and
Almond catchments.
Point source pollution from sewage
disposal
This, and to a lesser extent diffuse source
pollution from sewage disposal, is a significant pressure within
the Forth area affecting the majority of catchments. It is a
particular issue within the Avon, Almond, Esk and Tyne
catchments.
Diffuse pollution from
agriculture
Such pollution affects the majority of
catchments, but is a particular issue in the Eye Water, Tyne,
Leven, Stirling coastal, South Fife coastal and East Lothian
coastal catchments.
Point and diffuse source pollution
from mining and quarrying of coal and oil shale
This legacy impact from our industrial past is
causing pressures in the Almond, Avon, Esk, Leven and South Fife
coastal catchments and groundwaters of the Forth area.
Other pressures
Although not a key pressure throughout the
Forth advisory group area, agricultural abstraction is causing a
pressure within the East Lothian coastal and Tyne catchments, and
in the River Leven catchment there are numerous abstraction
pressures reflecting the diversity industries operating within this
area.
Invasive non-native
species
Our water environment is also at risk of
deterioration due to the presence of invasive non-native species.
In the Forth advisory group area, the Tiel Burn in the South Fife
coastal catchment is at less than good ecological status due to an
established population of the invasive non-native North American
signal crayfish.
As further information is gathered on invasive
non-native species within the Forth advisory group area it is
likely that further pressures will be identified. Indeed we would
expect more morphological pressures to be highlighted within the
area once riparian invasive non native species such as Japanese
knotweed, giant hogweed and Himalayan balsam are included within
the morphological classification.
The above list does not include all impacts
and there are other issues that will also need to be addressed
through river basin management planning. Appendix 1 provides an
overview of the number of water bodies affected by the different
pressures within each catchment. More detailed information on the
pressures and impacts in each catchment, including the specific
water bodies affected, measures and objectives, is included in the
catchment profiles and in the water body information files, both
available on SEPA’s website.
Objectives for the water environment
As the classification results and analysis of
pressures show, the water environment in the Forth advisory group
area is under significant pressure and there is a challenge to
restore water bodies to good ecological status. However, it is
important to remember that there have been significant improvements
over the past 40 or so years, primarily to water quality. The task
now is to build on that achievement. In the Forth area we aim to
improve our water bodies so that by 2027 96% of them are at good or
high ecological status. This will help to deliver the overall goal
of the Scotland river basin district, which is for 97% of water
bodies to be in good or better condition by 2027.
To achieve this, water bodies will be
protected from deterioration and action will be taken to enhance
and restore those which are below good ecological status. Restoring
waters to good ecological status will take time, so improvements
have been prioritised over the river basin planning cycles until
2027. For the small proportion of waters for which achieving good
ecological status by 2027 is not feasible, all reasonably
achievable improvements will be made. Comprehensive reviews of
progress will be undertaken during each period and will be reported
in updates of this plan
Table 3 shows how the water environment in the
Forth area is projected to improve in the period to 2027
(illustrated in Maps 3a and 3b). This gradual improvement reflects
the time needed to develop and implement the necessary technical
solutions and to make the required investments and adjustments
without creating disproportionate burdens. However, these are still
ambitious objectives and only through working together can we
deliver the required improvements.
|
Table 3: Projected improvements in the
status of water bodies in the Forth advisory group
area
|
|
Category
|
All water bodies
|
Number of water bodies at good or high
ecological status/potential
|
Number of water bodies <good in
2027
|
|
2008
|
2015
|
2021
|
2027
|
|
Rivers
|
189
|
28
|
48
|
77
|
184
|
5
|
|
Lochs
|
23
|
2
|
6
|
7
|
22
|
1
|
|
Estuaries
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
0
|
|
Coastal waters
|
11
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
11
|
0
|
|
Groundwater
|
29
|
17
|
20
|
21
|
24
|
5
|
|
Artificial
|
10
|
7
|
8
|
8
|
10
|
0
|
|
Totals
|
268
|
70
|
97
|
128
|
258
|
11
|
|
Proportion good or better
(%)
|
|
26%
|
36%
|
48%
|
96%
|
|
Lower (less stringent) objectives than
good status
For 11 water bodies in the Forth advisory
group area, we believe that good ecological status cannot be
achieved by 2027. For these water bodies, we have set a lower (less
stringent) objective than good ecological status.
The Tiel Burn in the South Fife Coastal
catchment is projected to be at moderate ecological status by 2027
due to difficulties in tackling the invasive North American signal
crayfish population. There is currently no known means of
eradicating this species from rivers.
In the River Forth catchment, the Duchray
Water is likely to continue to suffer from acidification associated
with forestry. The time needed for recovery is difficult to
predict, but it is likely to be beyond 2027. Also within the River
Forth catchment, Allt Gleann nam Meann and the Finglas
Water will continue to be
at poor ecological status because of a barrier to fish passage at
the downstream Glen Finglas Reservoir. This barrier will not be
addressed because the environmental benefits of installing fish
passage are low compared with the costs involved.
In the River Esk catchment, the River South
Esk (source to Gladhouse Reservoir) water body will continue to be
classed at poor ecological status. This is because Gladhouse
Reservoir is causing a barrier to fish passage and will not be
addressed because the environmental benefits of installing fish
passage are low compared with the costs involved.
Gartmorn Dam, a heavily modified water body in
the Stirling coastal catchment, is projected to remain at poor
ecological potential because of the ecological recovery time
associated with impacts from diffuse phosphorous inputs.
Five groundwater bodies also have lower (less
stringent) objectives. The water quality of the Dalkeith, Stirling
and Falkirk, Alloa and South Fife bedrock and localised sand and
gravel aquifers has been adversely affected by pollution arising
from past coal mining activities. The water quality of the
Edinburgh and Livingston bedrock and localised sand and gravel
aquifers has been adversely affected by pollution arising from past
oil-shale mining activities. The groundwater status recovery time
within these five areas is currently projected to be beyond
2027.

Map 3a: Projected improvements in surface
water status over the three cycles (click for larger image)

Map 3b: Projected improvements in groundwater
quality over the three cycles (click for larger image)
Protected area objectives
Many water bodies are also part of
water-dependant protected areas. As well as being required to meet
good ecological status/potential, these water bodies must also
achieve the objectives for which the protected area was
established. Protected areas include waters that:
- support economically important
shellfish;
- have been designated as bathing
waters;
- provide water for human
consumption;
- support species or habitats identified as
requiring special protection under European legislation (Natura
2000 sites).
Many protected areas are already achieving the
goals for which they were established. The objective for these
areas is to protect them from deterioration. Further environmental
improvements are needed for other areas that are currently not
meeting their objectives. Information on the protected areas within
the Forth advisory group area together with any planned
improvements are summarised below.
Natura 2000 sites
There are five water-dependant Special Areas
of Conservation within the Forth advisory group area:
- Berwickshire and North Northumberland Coast;
- Isle of May;
- River Teith;
- St Abb’s Head to Fast Castle;
- Kippenrait Glen.
Three of these are currently achieving their
objectives and two, the Berwickshire and North Northumberland Coast
and Kippenrait Glen, are currently failing to achieve their
objectives - Berwickshire and North Northumberland Coast on account
of diffuse pollution from agriculture and Kippenrait Glen due to
the presence of rhododendron, an invasive non-native species, and
the presence of other non-native tree species such as beech,
sycamore and spruce. Both are forecast to be achieving their
objectives by 2015.
There are six water-dependant Special
Protection Areas within the Forth advisory group area which are all
achieving their objectives:
- Loch Leven;
- Forth Islands;
- Gladhouse Reservoir;
- St Abbs Head to Fast Castle;
- South Tayside Goose Roosts;
- Firth of Forth.
Bathing waters
There are 26 bathing waters within the Forth
advisory group area: five classified as poor; three as sufficient;
six as good and 12 as excellent. The five currently classed as
failing (ie less than sufficient) are Kinghorn (Harbour Beach);
Portobello (Central); Portobello (West); Eyemouth; and Kirkcaldy
(Seafield).
Under the revised Bathing Waters Directive the
aim is to ensure that all designated bathing waters are classified
as ‘sufficient’ by 2015. Bathing waters also have an overall aim to
increase the proportion attaining a good or excellent
classification rather than sufficient.
Shellfish waters
There is only one area designated under the
Shellfish Waters Directive within the Forth advisory group area:
Fife Ness to Elie. This area achieved the mandatory values set out
in the Shellfish Waters Directive as all the water quality
conditions required to support shellfish life and growth are being
achieved. However, like many other areas in Scotland, this area
failed to achieve the Shellfish Waters Directive’s more stringent
guide value for faecal coliforms in 2008. Our objective is to
achieve the guide value in this area by 2027.
Drinking water protected
areas
There are 60 drinking water protected areas in
the Forth advisory group area. One, the Loch Leven bedrock and
extensive sand and gravel aquifers, is at risk of deterioration due
to nitrate inputs from arable farming. This area is within an area
designated as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone under the Nitrates
Directive and action programmes have been established with the aim
of restoring the quality of water in this Drinking Water Protected
Area so that abstraction for human consumption can be resumed. This
action is expected to take some time to be effective because of the
lag time for groundwater recovery.
Drinking Water Protected Areas are currently
under review and any changes to designations will be reflected in
updates of this plan.
Nutrient sensitive areas: nitrate
vulnerable zones
Two nitrate vulnerable zones (NVZs) are either
within or partially within the Forth advisory group area:
- Edinburgh, East Lothian and the Borders NVZ;
- Strathmore and Fife NVZ.
Action programmes for these NVZs have been
established. The programmes aim to reduce water pollution caused by
nitrates from agricultural sources and to prevent further such
pollution. The action programme will be reviewed and, where
necessary, revised every four years based on assessment of its
effectiveness.
Nutrient sensitive areas: Urban Waste
Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD) sensitive areas
There are 25 Urban Waste Water Treatment
Directive sensitive areas within the Forth advisory group area.
These are not assessed against an environmental standard. Instead,
compliance is measured in terms of measures taken, such as
improvements to sewage treatment works. All relevant wastewater
treatment plants in the Scotland river basin district have tertiary
treatment and so no further action is required at these.
Freshwater fish
There are 16 protected areas for economically
important freshwater fish, 14 for salmonids and 2 for cyprinids (the Forth & Clyde and Union
Canals). All areas are currently achieving the mandatory standards
required by the Freshwater Fish Directive.
- Bodies of groundwater are classed at either good status
or poor status.
- The water body information sheet for the
Finglas Water, which can be found on the SEPA website, currently
states that it will reach good status by 2015. This is an error
which will be amended when the water body information sheets are
updated.