SUDS explained
Implicit to the correct design and operation of a good SUD
System is an understanding of the following:
- the SUDS philosophy
- the SUDS triangle
- the SUDS treatment train
The SUDS philosophy is simply to mimic natural
drainage. When construction takes place the urbanisation of
catchments and sub-catchments occurs, and the natural hydrology is
affected. This results in reduced supply of rainfall to groundwater
by the interception of run-off on areas of hardstanding (eg roads,
roofs and paved surfaces). This in turn means less supply to
springs and river network resulting in lower flows and increased
likelihood of drought during dry periods.
In addition, by intercepting run-off and routing it through
smooth conduits and piped networks, we accelerate the passage of
flow to the receiving watercourses resulting in higher peak flows
and flooding. Another effect of this is greater erosion and damage
to river banks and beds.
The SUDS triangle encourages us to take account
of:

By considering all three functions we should be able to provide
adequate and well designed systems that offer water quality
treatment through natural process inherent in the system, encourage
infiltration where appropriate and attenuate peak flows in addition
to providing habitat and function for those using the area,
including the local community and wildlife.
The SUDS treatment train uses a logical
sequence of SUDS facilities in series thus allowing run-off to pass
through several different SUDS before reaching the receiving
watercourse or water bodies. By using the treatment train, run-off
will encounter different passive treatment processes that are
active in different types of facilities.
The treatment train comprises four stages:
- Good houskeeping
- Source control
- Site control
- Regional control
Good housekeeping
Uses best practice to reduce the prospects of pollutants
reaching the environment by improving techniques that may cause
pollution, or produce or use less polluting materials. Eg use
of more environmentally friendly materials such as phosphate free
detergents.
Good housekeeping also includes measures that reduce the
prospects of flooding by encouraging more natural run-off
paths.
Eg canopies over factory or shop loading bays that have their
flow routed through a SUD system, rather than routing this
high-risk area to the sewage works.
Source controls
These facilities allow control of run-off at or adjacent to the
source (ie where rainfall lands on a surface). Eg permeable, or
porous surfaces such as permeable paving, grasscrete, filter
trenches, or swales.
Site controls
Local facilities that will receive run-off from upstream
locations, often with several inlets and only one controlled
outlet. Eg detention basin, small pond.
Regional control
These include ponds and wetlands and are larger features that
will collect run-off from upstream controls. They should not
receive significant pollutants; these should have been managed
by the upstream provisions. Where possible regional controls should
be used as landscape features and provide final 'polishing' of the
treatment train prior to discharge.
The schematic diagram below shows the treatment train
concept and samples taken from a treatment train serving a timber
yard near Lockerbie. Note the importance of source control.
